xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"> Mountnessing Bridge Club

Mountnessing Bridge Club

 

 

Board 13: Another nightmare on board 13!

 

 

Hand played on 

18th January 2007

Board number 13

Red Section

Dealer

North

Vulnerability

Both

Submitted by

Alaric Cundy

 

 

 

North

ª 84

© JT53

¨ 9874

§ J82

 

 

 

 

West

ª 93

© A

¨ J6532

§ K9743

 

East

ª KQT762

© 9

¨ AKQT

§ T5

 

 

 

 

 

North

 

 

 

Bidding: 

 

East

 

 

 

 

 

South

 

 

 

 

 

West

 

 

South

ª AJ5

© KQ87642

¨ -

§ AQ6

 

 

No

No

4©

End

1ª

x

No

 3©

No

No

No

  4§

x

 

 

I don't know if you have been keeping count, but ever since I instituted this 'Board 13' feature there have been far more minuses than pluses on the board for partner and me - not ALWAYS 'our fault', but on this one I should 'carry the can' just for one teeny but critical error in the bidding.  South's 3© bid was described as showing a good opening hand, and East's second round double was a standard re-opening bid.  With a minor 2-suited hand and a spade shortage, holding the West cards I should bid 4¨ rather than 4§.  When 4© came round to me, I appeared to have no where to go other than 'to take the money'.  Well, not quite...

 

I led a spade at trick one, which was won by Declarer's Ace.  The King of hearts was played, and I won, and led my second spade - rather helpful for Declarer.  Dummy's jack of clubs proved to be a vital card, and Declarer restricted the losers to three tricks - one each in spades, hearts, and clubs.  So that was 790 to NS - a second 'top' for our opponents.  As it happened, had I bid 4¨ rather than 4§ I would have struck gold.  Partner would have bid 5¨ over 4©, and now if 5© is bid a double from me provides 200 our way - and that appears to have happened at several tables.  If partner had passed 4© I would have had 5§ available as an option - and on this hand, clearly partner would have bid 5¨.  Nobody actually played the hand in 5¨ but it looks to me that, despite the horrible break, we may be able to rustle up 11 tricks - even if it goes off it will yield a better score even than 4© undoubled making.

 

I teach my beginners that with a weak / moderate hand, if you hold two five-card touching suits, you should bid the higher ranking first, and that way you may get the opportunity to bid both of them.  I should practice what I preach...